← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beau Jelsma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Barrie Colts OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Barrie Colts OHL 68 27 20 47 0.691 0.3999 0.4162 1.7760 1.8485
2022-23 Barrie Colts OHL 67 31 30 61 0.910 0.5267 0.5254 2.3393 2.3336
2023-24 Barrie Colts OHL 67 37 44 81 1.209 0.6994 0.6642 3.1065 2.9502
2024-25 Barrie Colts OHL 57 20 32 52 0.912 0.5278 0.4740 2.3442 2.1053
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 35 3 9 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2025-26 · Providence
-33.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4246
Forward overall
#97
Forward born in 2004
#200
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.