IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kocha Delic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sudbury Wolves OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Sudbury Wolves OHL 65 17 29 46 0.708 0.4107 0.4248 1.8135 1.8756
2022-23 Sudbury Wolves OHL 46 22 30 52 1.130 0.6560 0.6501 2.8967 2.8706
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 57 30 34 64 1.123 0.6516 0.6146 2.8772 2.7136
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 46 22 32 54 1.174 0.6812 0.6073 3.0081 2.6817
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 11 14 25 0.694
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2025-26 · Miami
+22.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3230
Forward overall
#57
Forward born in 2004
#129
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.