← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kocha Delic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sudbury Wolves OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Sudbury Wolves OHL 65 17 29 46 0.708 0.4094 0.4234 1.8184 1.8807
2022-23 Sudbury Wolves OHL 46 22 30 52 1.130 0.6539 0.6480 2.9046 2.8785
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 57 30 34 64 1.123 0.6495 0.6126 2.8850 2.7210
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 46 22 32 54 1.174 0.6791 0.6054 3.0163 2.6890
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 11 14 25 0.694
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2025-26 · Miami
+22.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3321
Forward overall
#58
Forward born in 2004
#120
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.