← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Misa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-25 Country: Canada
2024 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #150  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 OHL 62 4 22 26 0.419 0.2434 0.2725 1.0747 1.2033
2022-23 OHL 64 13 30 43 0.672 0.3899 0.4197 1.7217 1.8532
2023-24 Brampton Steelheads OHL 66 26 55 81 1.227 0.7122 0.7325 3.1450 3.2348
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 67 34 51 85 1.269 0.7362 0.7192 3.2510 3.1760
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 37 8 11 19 0.513
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.67
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2025-26 · Penn State
-23.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3369
Forward overall
#57
Forward born in 2005
#151
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.