IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradyn Maclean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-07 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Boston Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 41 5 16 21 0.512 0.0670 0.0663 0.1738 0.1719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33596
Forward overall
#1839
Forward born in 2006
#2774
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brayden Deschamps
0.42
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Mike Caparco
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Nicholas Giamou
0.33
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Brady Bomal
0.18
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Spethmann
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Coltyn Bates
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Losel
Morrisville · 2024-25
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.