← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastien Gervais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-11 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Saginaw Spirit OHL 66 10 15 25 0.379 0.2191 0.2385 0.9733 1.0594
2022-23 Saginaw Spirit OHL 68 10 14 24 0.353 0.2042 0.2134 0.9068 0.9478
2023-24 Saginaw Spirit OHL 68 12 22 34 0.500 0.2893 0.2885 1.2848 1.2814
2024-25 Saginaw Spirit OHL 57 8 23 31 0.544 0.3146 0.2975 1.3976 1.3218
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 68 21 27 48 0.706 0.4084 0.3657 1.8138 1.6241
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11975
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 2005
#568
in OHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHL 2015-16
0.54
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2013-14
0.16
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.