IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nic Pierog Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Surrey Eagles BCHL 54 9 15 24 0.444 0.1712 0.1656 0.6467 0.6257
2013-14 — BCHL 58 31 18 49 0.845 0.3255 0.2999 1.2294 1.1326
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 38 5 9 14 0.368
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 39 7 4 11 0.282
2015-16 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 37 5 8 13 0.351
2014-15 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 37 4 2 6 0.162
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2014-15 · Clarkson
-23.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21051
Forward overall
#723
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.