← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Hineman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-20 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 41 18 36 54 1.317 0.1216 0.1289 0.3016 0.3198
2024-25 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 37 28 33 61 1.649 0.1522 0.1538 0.3775 0.3816
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 11 12 23 0.742
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 11 12 23 0.742
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 11 12 23 0.742
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 11 12 23 0.742
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 11 12 23 0.742

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19613
Forward overall
#840
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.