← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris O'Flaherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-12 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Windsor Spitfires OHL 47 3 2 5 0.106 0.0616 0.0668 0.2727 0.2957
2022-23 OHL 69 7 7 14 0.203 0.1174 0.1222 0.5199 0.5413
2023-24 London Knights OHL 16 0 4 4 0.250 0.1446 0.1436 0.6406 0.6363
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 26 14 3 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2025-26 · Lake Forest
+465.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38833
Forward overall
#2436
Forward born in 2005
#1274
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2018-19
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.