IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Wiggins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 29 4 12 16 0.552 0.0411 0.0419 0.1264 0.1289
2016-17 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 41 9 15 24 0.585 0.0436 0.0420 0.1341 0.1291
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 29 31 16 47 1.621
2003-04 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 24 14 11 25 1.042
2002-03 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 14 3 8 11 0.786
2001-02 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 26 6 12 18 0.692

NCAAe Rankings

#46489
Forward overall
#2137
Forward born in 1996
#572
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Hervey
Adrian · 2012-13
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Douglas
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Faggas
Babson · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.