IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Hervey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.1351 0.1358 0.6784 0.6817
2010-11 Lincoln Stars USHL 44 4 3 7 0.159 0.0939 0.0968 0.4778 0.4925
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1161 0.6007 0.5911
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 52 6 8 14 0.269 0.1588 0.1478 0.8085 0.7525
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 8 6 14 0.500
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 26 11 9 20 0.769
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 25 5 3 8 0.320
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 21 3 7 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2013-14 · Adrian
+311.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35863
Forward overall
#1364
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.