| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.182 | 0.1410 | 0.1417 | 0.6766 | 0.6799 |
| 2010-11 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 44 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.159 | 0.0978 | 0.1008 | 0.4687 | 0.4831 |
| 2011-12 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.1229 | 0.1209 | 0.5892 | 0.5798 |
| 2012-13 | Indiana Ice | USHL | 52 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.269 | 0.1655 | 0.1540 | 0.7931 | 0.7382 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SR | 28 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.500 |
| 2015-16 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | JR | 26 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.769 |
| 2014-15 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SO | 25 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.320 |
| 2013-14 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | FR | 21 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.476 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.