← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-21 Country: USA
Wesleyan
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 46 2 7 9 0.196 0.0798 0.0829 0.1573 0.1635
2024-25 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 53 7 20 27 0.509 0.2077 0.2066 0.4095 0.4074
2025-26 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 52 9 31 40 0.769 0.3136 0.2951 0.6183 0.5819
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2552
Defenseman overall
#626
Defenseman born in 2005
#387
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

Wesleyan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.32
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.36
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.40
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2009-10
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.