IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Mahar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-25 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 26 7 16 23 0.885 0.2495 0.2495 0.4048 0.4048
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 17 27 44 1.571 0.4433 0.4433 0.7191 0.7191
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.0689 0.0701 0.1826 0.1858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 25 6 3 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2025-26 · Wesleyan
+91.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23914
Forward overall
#1347
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Ferreira
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Nathe
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiest
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.