IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Ferreira Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 53 21 29 50 0.943 0.2046 0.2114 0.7299 0.7540
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 58 38 37 75 1.293 0.2805 0.2774 1.0005 0.9893
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 12 3 4 7 0.583
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 22 5 2 7 0.318
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 7 8 15 0.556
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2014-15 · SUNY Oswego
-33.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11070
Forward overall
#415
Forward born in 1993
#99
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Sweeney
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.