← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brennan Cail Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-11 Country: USA
Roger Williams
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 20 5 3 8 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2022-23 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 21 7 8 15 0.714 0.1415 0.1415 0.3254 0.3254
2023-24 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 22 9 14 23 1.046 0.2071 0.2071 0.4763 0.4763
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 26 7 5 12 0.462 0.1882 0.1878 0.3710 0.3701
2025-26 NCDC 46 10 10 20 0.435 0.1773 0.1673 0.3495 0.3299
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18181
Forward overall
#968
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Roger Williams Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Roger Williams
0.67
actual FR PPG at Roger Williams
0.60
actual FR PPG at Roger Williams
0.20
actual FR PPG at Roger Williams

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.