← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Briggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 24 11 7 18 0.750 0.0692 0.0703 0.1718 0.1744
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2020-21 · West Virginia University
+84.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
100%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40272
Forward overall
#2192
Forward born in 2000
#316
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2000-01
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.