IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Creger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 14 5 19 0.432 0.0565 0.0605 0.1466 0.1571
2018-19 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 36 15 23 38 1.056 0.1381 0.1407 0.3583 0.3649
2019-20 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 13 40 53 1.204 0.1575 0.1575 0.4088 0.4088
2020-21 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 43 31 47 78 1.814 0.2373 0.2373 0.6157 0.6157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6378
Forward overall
#267
Forward born in 2000
#175
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Friedman
Trinity · 2022-23
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bancroft
Concordia · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Stone
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.