IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Stone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edina USHS-MN 22 3 3 6 0.273 0.0336 0.0336 0.0662 0.0662
2020-21 West Bend Power NA3HL 20 6 9 15 0.750 0.0829 0.0829 0.2376 0.2376
2021-22 West Bend Power NA3HL 45 15 21 36 0.800 0.0885 0.0897 0.2534 0.2569
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 7 4 11 0.440
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 23 5 9 14 0.609
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 25 6 6 12 0.480
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 24 5 6 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+695.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35636
Forward overall
#2195
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Wood
Hamline · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Howatt
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.