IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Wood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 — OJHL 42 11 13 24 0.571 0.1401 0.1509 0.3911 0.4211
2004-05 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 41 7 15 22 0.537 0.1315 0.1350 0.3673 0.3769
2005-06 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 44 11 17 28 0.636 0.1560 0.1544 0.4356 0.4310
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Babson D3 — SR 27 14 5 19 0.704
2008-09 Babson D3 — JR 28 9 8 17 0.607
2007-08 Babson D3 — SO 19 6 8 14 0.737
2006-07 Babson D3 — FR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2003-04 Hamline D3 — SO 25 0 2 2 0.080
2002-03 Hamline D3 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#31801
Forward overall
#1005
Forward born in 1987
#1760
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Edward Osowski
Becker · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tory Allan
Norwich · 2007-08
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.