← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Stuckless Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Toronto Patriots OJHL 54 10 11 21 0.389 0.0953 0.0991 0.2678 0.2786
2016-17 Caledon Admirals OJHL 52 20 27 47 0.904 0.2215 0.2205 0.6223 0.6195
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 48 7 12 19 0.396 0.1454 0.1411 0.4178 0.4055
2018-19 NAHL 57 11 18 29 0.509 0.1869 0.1730 0.5370 0.4972
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 23 3 8 11 0.478
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 22 6 5 11 0.500
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC 25 4 8 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Skidmore
+249.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27531
Forward overall
#1345
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.