← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Fibigr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-22 Country: Czechia
2024 · Round 7, Pick #202  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USHL-Style-Czech 43 2 12 14 0.326 0.1005 0.1104 0.3477 0.3821
2023-24 Brampton Steelheads OHL 61 7 36 43 0.705 0.4078 0.4328 1.8112 1.9221
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 58 3 30 33 0.569 0.3292 0.3324 1.4620 1.4761
2025-26 Windsor Spitfires OHL 56 10 30 40 0.714 0.4132 0.3964 1.8354 1.7608
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1954
Defenseman overall
#333
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.44
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2024-25
0.27
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.