IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-26 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 5, Pick #155  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Winona USHS-MN 27 2 4 6 0.222 0.0281 0.0281 0.0540 0.0540
2022-23 Aurora Tigers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Sarnia Sting OHL 49 11 9 20 0.408 0.2361 0.2655 1.0688 1.2017
2024-25 Sarnia Sting OHL 68 16 25 41 0.603 0.3488 0.3742 1.5786 1.6934
2025-26 London Knights OHL 67 22 41 63 0.940 0.5440 0.5562 2.4621 2.5174
2026-27 London Knights OHL 2 0 3 3 1.500 0.8678 0.8678 3.9276 3.9276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8791
Forward overall
#192
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Stephen Halliday
USHL 2021-22
1.02
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Tanner Laczynski
USHL 2015-16
0.94
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.