IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Delisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-15 Country: Canada
Michigan Tech
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Oshawa Generals OHL 63 7 11 18 0.286 0.1653 0.1821 0.7341 0.8089
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 63 11 26 37 0.587 0.3398 0.3569 1.5091 1.5850
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 31 33 64 0.941 0.5445 0.5445 2.4184 2.4184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9530
Forward overall
#202
Forward born in 2007
#469
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Tech Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Marcus Pedersen
SHL-J20 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
Alex Gillies
BCHL 2013-14
0.24
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
Kyle Kukkonen
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.69
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
Gavin Gould
BCHL 2014-15
0.70
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.