IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Pedersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-25 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 35 6 4 10 0.286 0.1127 0.1182 0.3880 0.4069
2019-20 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 43 20 20 40 0.930 0.3671 0.3671 1.2633 1.2633
2020-21 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 17 5 9 14 0.824 0.3250 0.3250 1.1184 1.1184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SR 29 4 4 8 0.276
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 37 5 4 9 0.243
2022-23 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2021-22 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8044
Forward overall
#348
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Iwanski
Hamilton · 2006-07
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Cobbold
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Moher
Amherst · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.