← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Evancho Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0849 0.0938 0.3995 0.4414
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 42 4 7 11 0.262 0.1668 0.1754 0.7848 0.8253
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 51 8 9 17 0.333 0.2122 0.2132 0.9988 1.0036
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 37 18 17 35 0.946 0.2643 0.2550 0.6528 0.6297
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 52 31 49 80 1.538 0.4299 0.3910 1.0617 0.9656
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Army D1 AHA SR 22 6 9 15 0.682
2018-19 Army D1 AHA JR 39 10 19 29 0.744
2017-18 Army D1 AHA SO 31 8 7 15 0.484
2016-17 Army D1 AHA FR 37 13 10 23 0.622
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Army
+115.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8701
Forward overall
#301
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.