IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dawson Cook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 2 10 12 0.218 0.1736 0.1794 0.8172 0.8445
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 59 7 7 14 0.237 0.1887 0.1852 0.8887 0.8720
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 15 18 33 0.559 0.3562 0.3586 1.6761 1.6872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 38 6 2 8 0.210
2016-17 Notre Dame D1 — JR 39 1 5 6 0.154
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 — SO 32 3 1 4 0.125
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 — FR 35 1 1 2 0.057
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2014-15 · Notre Dame
-76.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12780
Forward overall
#451
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor O'Neil
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Vermont (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Gylling
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bud Winter
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.