IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Gylling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0796 0.0842 0.3746 0.3961
2012-13 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 16 29 45 0.789 0.2931 0.3057 0.8359 0.8717
2013-14 — NAHL 60 15 23 38 0.633 0.2351 0.2334 0.6705 0.6656
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 52 29 21 50 0.962 0.3570 0.3357 1.0180 0.9572
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Arizona State D1 — FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Arizona State
-4.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10177
Forward overall
#413
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Belger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.