← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan McLaughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-05 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Växjö Lakers HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 48 1 6 7 0.146 0.0896 0.0990 0.4296 0.4748
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 8 7 15 0.326 0.2005 0.2109 0.9608 1.0108
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 60 8 26 34 0.567 0.3484 0.3502 1.6696 1.6785
2014-15 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 60 8 31 39 0.650 0.3996 0.3821 1.9150 1.8309
2023-24 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 45 12 17 29 0.644 1.6110 1.4808
2024-25 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 51 11 18 29 0.569 1.4215 1.2233
2025-26 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 52 11 11 22 0.423 1.0577 1.0577
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA SR 37 19 21 40 1.081
2017-18 Canisius D1 AHA JR 37 17 31 48 1.297
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA SO 39 14 19 33 0.846
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA FR 39 8 18 26 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2015-16 · Canisius
+110.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#762
Forward overall
#48
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.97 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.