IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Cammarata Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 27 42 69 1.150 0.7323 0.8071 3.4462 3.7981
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 38 55 93 1.576 1.0038 1.0529 4.7237 4.9547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 34 5 15 20 0.588
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 37 7 12 19 0.513
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 39 3 24 27 0.692
2013-14 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 39 10 17 27 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.95
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2013-14 · Minnesota
-27.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#158
Forward overall
#7
Forward born in 1995
#13
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
1.00 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.