← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxim Dirracolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-29 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kitchener Rangers OHL 31 1 4 5 0.161 0.0933 0.0987 0.4223 0.4468
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 65 3 8 11 0.169 0.0979 0.0985 0.4430 0.4459
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 45 1 3 4 0.089 0.0514 0.0491 0.2328 0.2226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21423
Defenseman overall
#3452
Defenseman born in 2006
#1626
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHL 2013-14
0.26
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NAHL 2020-21
0.08
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2002-03
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2018-19
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.