← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Mallgrave Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kent School NE-Prep 28 1 0 1 0.036 0.0101 0.0101 0.0163 0.0163
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 26 1 13 14 0.538 0.1519 0.1519 0.2464 0.2464
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 3 17 20 0.714 0.2015 0.2015 0.3269 0.3269
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 9 3 12 0.200 0.1229 0.1166 0.5892 0.5590
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10192
Defenseman overall
#2191
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.