← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Tobey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cape Cod Islanders NA3HL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.1106 0.1199 0.3168 0.3433
2018-19 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 10 13 23 0.605 0.0886 0.0892 0.2968 0.2987
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC GR 23 3 9 12 0.522
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 25 8 10 18 0.720
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 16 5 9 14 0.875
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 6 2 2 4 0.667
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 19 0 7 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2017-18 · Westfield State
+225.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5901
Defenseman overall
#1334
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.