IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bulach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 52 6 9 15 0.288 0.1123 0.1154 0.4207 0.4325
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 15 18 33 0.589 0.2294 0.2235 0.8594 0.8371
2008-09 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 25 31 56 1.000 0.3892 0.3628 1.4583 1.3593
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 26 10 7 17 0.654
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 25 9 6 15 0.600
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 24 4 5 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2009-10 · SUNY Geneseo
+42.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12337
Forward overall
#556
Forward born in 1988
#993
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Covelli
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.