IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leighton Biesiadecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.0630 0.0636 0.2205 0.2224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 20 14 34 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36184
Forward overall
#2232
Forward born in 2004
#1224
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Antonucci
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rory Gagnon
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Gard
Lake Forest · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.