← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Dreveny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 29 1 0 1 0.035 0.0032 0.0035 0.0079 0.0086
2019-20 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Elite 38 1 5 6 0.158 0.0146 0.0146 0.0362 0.0362
2020-21 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Elite 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 26 2 3 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.00
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2020-21 · University of Alabama
+5727.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
98%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31403
Defenseman overall
#4296
Defenseman born in 2002
#2126
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2017-18
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.