← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec MacKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0197 0.0219 0.0703 0.0782
2013-14 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 51 11 36 47 0.922 0.1539 0.1565 0.3837 0.3903
2015-16 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 39 18 19 37 0.949 0.1584 0.1535 0.3949 0.3828
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen JR 8 0 2 2 0.250
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 8 0 2 2 0.250
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+25.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31797
Forward overall
#1343
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.