IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Parks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lakeville North High USHS-MN 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 43 6 17 23 0.535 0.0671 0.0684 0.1689 0.1722
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 45 15 29 44 0.978 0.1227 0.1187 0.3087 0.2985
2019-20 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 41 13 15 28 0.683 0.0857 0.0857 0.2156 0.2156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33213
Forward overall
#1796
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Brown
Bowdoin · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Jensen
Augsburg · 2006-07
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.