IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Piercey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brockville Braves CCHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0271 0.0301 0.0958 0.1065
2018-19 Brockville Braves CCHL 48 0 5 5 0.104 0.0226 0.0241 0.0798 0.0852
2019-20 — OJHL 45 0 9 9 0.200 0.0490 0.0490 0.1377 0.1377
2020-21 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.0262 0.0262 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2021-22 · Rivier
+344.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25104
Defenseman overall
#3523
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Scott Savage
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Schwamberger
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Schmidt
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Scuglia
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.