IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0307 0.0325 0.0880 0.0933
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 15 26 41 0.891 0.0986 0.1007 0.2824 0.2883
2014-15 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 40 17 26 43 1.075 0.1189 0.1156 0.3406 0.3311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 8 1 2 3 0.375
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+219.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29388
Forward overall
#1161
Forward born in 1995
#1033
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Walsh
Stonehill · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Zakrzewski
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gierman
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.