IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Schwamberger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 USNTDP Juniors USHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.1475 0.1581 0.7509 0.8051
2002-03 Lincoln Stars USHL 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0621 0.0627 0.3163 0.3195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 25 4 6 10 0.400
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2003-04 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2003-04 · SUNY Geneseo
+286.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54528
Forward overall
#1516
Forward born in 1984
#4102
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexander Kenerson
Bowdoin · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean McAvoy
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
J.J. Lemieux
Bowdoin · 2020-21
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.