IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Huntington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Utah Outliers NCDC 37 3 12 15 0.405 0.2261 0.2261 0.3278 0.3279
2024-25 Utah Outliers NCDC 50 6 15 21 0.420 0.2342 0.2238 0.3396 0.3246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 3 3 0.300

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23630
Forward overall
#1305
Forward born in 2004
#758
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Hora
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Rankin
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jakub Hall
SUNY Potsdam · 2022-23
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.