IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc L'Heureux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Elite 27 15 14 29 1.074 0.0991 0.0991 0.2460 0.2460
2021-22 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Elite 42 36 22 58 1.381 0.1275 0.1207 0.3162 0.2992
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 19 23 0.958

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25346
Forward overall
#1414
Forward born in 2002
#62
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Puddifant
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Johnson
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.