← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Little Falls USHS-MN 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.0548 0.0548 0.1079 0.1079
2020-21 Little Falls USHS-MN 20 7 18 25 1.250 0.1540 0.1540 0.3036 0.3036
2021-22 Little Falls USHS-MN 27 31 44 75 2.778 0.3422 0.3422 0.6747 0.6747
2022-23 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 41 18 16 34 0.829 0.0917 0.0908 0.2627 0.2601
2023-24 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 14 31 45 1.023 0.1131 0.1066 0.3240 0.3052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA 18 2 2 4 0.222
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2024-25 · Lawrence
+323.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12531
Forward overall
#582
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.