← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Cohen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NCDC 36 4 10 14 0.389 0.1586 0.1587 0.3126 0.3127
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 50 13 11 24 0.480 0.1957 0.1846 0.3858 0.3639
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 26 10 11 21 0.808
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2020-21 Lake Forest D1 NCHA SO 5 2 1 3 0.600
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 5 2 1 3 0.600
2019-20 Lake Forest D1 NCHA FR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2019-20 · Lake Forest
+329.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19064
Forward overall
#907
Forward born in 1998
#640
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.