← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Pniewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 42 9 21 30 0.714 0.0659 0.0653 0.1636 0.1622
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 41 12 16 28 0.683 0.0630 0.0592 0.1564 0.1471
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 39 9 21 30 0.769 0.0710 0.0632 0.1761 0.1569
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200
2024-25 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200
2023-24 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200
2022-23 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200
2021-22 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200
2020-21 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 20 1 3 4 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13179
Defenseman overall
#2658
Defenseman born in 2004
#342
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2014-15
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.