IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Pridham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-08 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 3, Pick #92  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — BCHL 54 23 26 49 0.907 0.3496 0.3665 1.3205 1.3844
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 48 27 27 54 1.125 0.6508 0.6315 2.8907 2.8050
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 65 46 44 90 1.385 0.8010 0.7370 3.5577 3.2733
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3543
Forward overall
#63
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Chyzowski
WHL 2024-25
0.63
actual FR PPG at Denver
Alex Weiermair
WHL 2025-26
0.25
actual FR PPG at Denver
Clarke Caswell
WHL 2024-25
0.79
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.