IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beckham Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-06 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sarnia Sting OHL 62 25 20 45 0.726 0.4332 0.4690 1.8800 2.0354
2025-26 Sarnia Sting OHL 64 19 26 45 0.703 0.4196 0.4332 1.8212 1.8800
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4522
Forward overall
#60
Forward born in 2008
#581
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Ellis
USHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Grant Silianoff
USHL 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Brennan Ali
NTDP-U18 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Maddox Fleming
USHL 2021-22
0.34
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Tarantino
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.