IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Fitzgerald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-01 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 7, Pick #203  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Peterborough Petes OHL 48 12 16 28 0.583 0.3374 0.3692 1.5273 1.6715
2025-26 Soo Greyhounds OHL 63 15 18 33 0.524 0.3030 0.3164 1.3715 1.4320
2026-27 Soo Greyhounds OHL 6 3 3 6 1.000 0.5785 0.5785 2.6184 2.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14778
Forward overall
#227
Forward born in 2008
#678
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Bennett Schimek
USHL 2021-22
0.54
actual FR PPG at Providence
Beau Jelsma
OHL 2022-23
0.34
actual FR PPG at Providence
Brian Pinho
USHL 2013-14
0.46
actual FR PPG at Providence
Grant Porter
NCDC 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.