IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 6 8 14 0.438 0.1234 0.1234 0.2002 0.2002
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 12 6 18 0.643 0.1814 0.1814 0.2942 0.2942
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 33 17 27 44 1.333 0.7434 0.7434 1.0781 1.0781
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 57 9 11 20 0.351 0.2157 0.2033 1.0338 0.9745
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 35 12 23 35 1.000
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA SR 33 10 5 15 0.455
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA JR 16 4 3 7 0.438
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10042
Forward overall
#481
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filip Jakobsson
Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.