IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 6 8 14 0.438 0.0867 0.0867 0.1993 0.1993
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 12 6 18 0.643 0.1274 0.1274 0.2929 0.2929
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 33 17 27 44 1.333 0.5436 0.5436 1.0717 1.0717
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 57 9 11 20 0.351 0.2070 0.1951 1.0539 0.9934
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 35 12 23 35 1.000
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA SR 33 10 5 15 0.455
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA JR 16 4 3 7 0.438
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9284
Forward overall
#450
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
University of New England · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.