IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn McCall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 9 8 17 0.607 0.1203 0.1203 0.2766 0.2766
2023-24 Brooks Bandits AJHL 42 10 20 30 0.714 0.2396 0.2419 0.6610 0.6673
2024-25 Erie Otters OHL 38 2 11 13 0.342 0.1979 0.1847 0.8790 0.8206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 38 4 4 8 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2025-26 · Holy Cross
+7.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6282
Defenseman overall
#1536
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Van Bokkelen
Lebanon Valley · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Gray
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.