IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden McCuaig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-19 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cornwall Colts CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Cornwall Colts CCHL 45 16 14 30 0.667 0.1446 0.1638 — —
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 17 3 3 6 0.353 0.2042 0.2154 0.9068 0.9566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21670
Forward overall
#315
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Dawson Cook
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Ryan Garvey
OJHL 2013-14
0.19
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam Kauppila
NAHL 2013-14
0.09
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.